AB1955: The Parent Partition Act

Sacrificing Education for Politics

Assemblymember Laura Friedman’s vote in favor of AB1955, dubbed The Parent Partition Act, has ignited fierce debate. This bill bars school employees from disclosing a student's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression to parents without the student’s consent. Critics argue it prioritizes political agendas over parental rights and student safety.

A Divisive Measure

Friedman claims AB1955 is essential for student privacy, yet it undermines parental involvement. Parents argue they have the right to know significant aspects of their children’s lives to offer appropriate support.

Real-World Implications

Incidents like Konen v. Spreckels Union School District, where a student was socially transitioned without parental consent, highlight the risks. The legal fallout, including substantial settlements, emphasizes the dangers of excluding parents from crucial decisions.

Education in Decline

With California's educational performance and enrollment plummeting, focus should be on improving outcomes. AB1955 diverts attention from these critical issues, advancing a political agenda at the expense of educational quality and family trust.

Friedman's Broader Ambitions

Laura Friedman’s support for AB1955 is not confined to California. In her bid for Congress, she aims to take this agenda nationwide, further sidelining parents and prioritizing political correctness over effective education.

Conclusion

Laura Friedman’s backing of AB1955 reflects a disturbing legislative trend. By alienating parents, this bill threatens the essential partnership between schools and families, jeopardizing student success. It's time to prioritize educational quality and collaborative policies.

Explore Friedman’s opponent, Alex Balekian’s pro-parental rights position here.